Product Catalog
Generic Xenical (Orlistat, Xenical® equivalent)
Xenical is a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor used in the management of obesity in adult and adolescent patients age 12 and older. This medicine may be used during the weight loss phase or following weight loss to assist in weight management. Generic Xenical works by inhibiting the digestion of fats from the diet, and should be used with a reduced-calorie diet.
This product will arrive to you in 14-24 business days (free shipping worldwide)
120mg
| Quantity | Price | Price per pill | Returning customer price | Bonus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84 | € 141.29 | € 1.68 | € 127.09 | ---- | Add to cart |
Drug Medical Information
AGE AND BEHAVIOR: RETRIEVING MEMORIES - RETRIEVAL FUNCTIONS - SUPERIORITY OF RECOGNITION OVER RECALL - DELAYED RECOGNITION
The recall and recognition performances were made soon after exposure to the stimulus materials. Harwood and Naylor (1969) tested for recall and recognition, not soon after exposure but four weeks after such exposure; their results were quite different.
Part of this study was described in the previous chapter. A series of 20 drawings of familiar objects such as a tennis racket, a ladder, a tree, was presented one at a time to subjects aged 60-80 years and subjects aged 15-45 years. When all 20 drawings were presented, tests of recall were made. If the subject correctly recalled 16 or more items (80 percent), the procedure was regarded as completed. If fewer items were recalled, the procedure was repeated. It was repeated as many times as necessary to achieve at least an 80 percent recall performance.
At this point all the subjects thought the experiment was over, but about a month later they were again tested; this time, with both a recall test and a recognition test. The recognition test followed the recall test and it involved the original 20 drawings plus 40 additional ones as the incorrect alternatives.
The results were comparable to those of Schonfield in that the age decline in recall was greater than in recognition, and it was compatible with Erber's study in that a significant recognition performance decline with age was also found. This decline was not great—the younger group had a mean recognition score of 19.00, while the old had 16.55—but it was statistically significant even after equating for initial learning. The results were also compatible with those of a study by Gordon and Clark (1974). They compared the retention of information read in a paragraph just previously with one read a week earlier. Age differences in both delayed recall and recognition memory were found, with the former being greater. Over one week, the elderly forget more of the information than the young.
The superiority of delayed recognition over delayed recall memory once again argues for a retrieval deficit in later life, but the recognition memory deficit argues for some storage problem as well. The coefficient of correlation between these two types of memories in the study by Harwood and Naylor was effectively zero, suggesting the independence of these two processes. Both processes were related to a small extent (r = 0.3) to the number of items correctly recalled after the last stimulus presentation, one month previously. They were not related, however, to the number of presentations required to originally recall the 80 percent correct. Considered altogether, the study by Harwood and Naylor suggests independence of the processes of delayed recall and recognition memory, and some independence of both these processes from short-term recall.
*393\220\8*
