Product Catalog
Generic Albenza (Albendazole, Albenza® equivalent)
Albendazole is an "antihelmintic," or anti-worm, medication. It prevents worms from growing or multiplying in your body. Albendazole is used to treat infections caused by worms such as pork tapeworm and dog tapeworm. Albendazole may also be used for purposes other than those listed in this medication guide.
This product will arrive to you in 14-24 business days (free shipping worldwide)
400mg
| Quantity | Price | Price per pill | Returning customer price | Bonus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $ 47.00 | $ 4.70 | $ 42.00 | ---- | Add to cart |
| 20 | $ 53.00 | $ 2.65 | $ 47.00 | ---- | Add to cart |
| 30 | $ 60.00 | $ 2.00 | $ 54.00 | ---- | Add to cart |
Drug Medical Information
AGE AND BEHAVIOR: MEMORY THEORY – LONG-TERM MEMORY - THREE TYPES OF MEMORY – RESEARCHES BY PERLMUTTER
Perlmutter (1978) used long-term memory questions in testing two age groups of men and women, 20-25 and 60—75 years, and reported results which at first may seem at variance with those above by Botwinick and Storandt. First, rather than finding the age groups similar in long-term recall, Perlmutter found her older group superior to the younger one. The age group in the 60s recalled 43 percent of the information asked while those in the 20s recalled only 30 percent. Thus, while different, both studies reported no age decline in this type of function. Second, Perlmutter did not find the younger subjects recalling more information of one time period and the older recalling more of another period. In other words, she did not find 15 to 25 years a key time to experience sociohistoric facts. However, reference to Figure 17.3 discloses that the age groups Perlmutter tested (20s and 60s) were not very different in their scores, certainly not in three of the time periods. This study and the Botwinick-Storandt study thus point in the same direction.
Accepting the 15-25 year age period as important for learning sociohistoric facts, it can be argued, but only in post hoc fashion, that impact and importance make for deep processing and so for long-term recall of secondary memory. However, the results of the Botwinick-Storandt study argue that long-term memory is different from short-term, secondary memory. Since the long-term memory questions made up only a few of the many memory tests given, the scores on all the tests were subjected to the statistical technique of a principal component analysis to determine the relationships among the different performances. Three separate memory factors were determined by the analysis: Not only were factors of primary memory and secondary memory seen, but there was also a long-term memory factor. The statistical analysis disclosed these three memory factors, each independent or unrelated to the other. In this way short-term memory and long-term memory were seen as different memory processes.
In this analysis age was related to primary memory more than the previous discussion on primary memory suggests. Age was clearly related to secondary, short-term memory, but, as indicated, not at all related to long-term memory.
*384\220\8*
